Home – New Forums Starting your journey Limited Partnership or Employee? Reply To: Limited Partnership or Employee?

#1129591
PRO
Member
  • Total posts: 450
Up
0
::

Marc

The information I am providing is neither inaccurate nor self serving it is. I have been involved in litigation where exactly that is the case. Solicitors stuff up too, but if they advise on legal matters, their insurance covers you. In litigation, as soon as we make a professional a party to the case, the professional insurer will closely examine the professional’s action to see if they can find an out.

The quote of mine you did is taken out of context of the previous response which was
“talking to an accountant about legal structures, legal issues and anything else of a legal nature that isn’t purely of a tax or financial nature”

The advice recommendation which I originally responded to included several references to legal or asset protection. Both of which come under the ambit of legal professional regulation acts

I agree with you about
” Sitting with my client discussing business structures alternatives, tax strategies, GST compliance issues, and the like” does not constitute legal advice. That is the financial and taxation advice that I stated in my original response.

However, an accountant advising on asset protection immediately over steps the boundaries.

Unfortunately Accounting is not a regulated profession (maybe it is in SA). There are no restrictions on the use of the title “Accountant”, hence the need for tax agent registration and the CA and CPA programs.

Ps, SA has completely different legislation regarding this to the rest of the country.

Marc D, post: 147516 wrote:
Hi Pro,

I feel I must reply as the information you are providing appears to be inaccurate and self serving and may be read by a member of the general public as suggesting that it is illegal for an accountant to provide advice on business structures, that doing so is an offence and they are not insured to do so.This is simply not true.

The provision of legal practice is restricted and is undefined in legislation with many arguments as to what constitutes legal practice. Firstly, the interpretation varies depending on which state has jurisdiction as the legal professional acts are state based so that the blanket statements you have made in fact have different interpretations depending on jurisdiction. For example, in South Australia, The Legal Practitioners Act 1981 S21 restricts the “practise (the) profession of law” (not tax advice and not even tax practice) as:

“a person practises the profession of the law, if acting for fee or reward on behalf
of some other person he or she—
(a) prepares any will or other testamentary instrument; or
(b) prepares an instrument creating, transferring, assigning, modifying or
extinguishing any estate or interest in real or personal property; or
(c) prepares any instrument relating to the formation of a body corporate, any
amendment to the memorandum or articles of association, rules or regulations
of a body corporate, any prospectus or take-over scheme relating to a body
corporate, or any instrument affecting the rights of shareholders or debenture
holders in a body corporate or any scheme of arrangement in respect of a
body corporate; or
(d) prepares any other instrument creating, transferring, assigning, modifying or
extinguishing any right, power or liability at law or in equity; or
(e) represents any party to proceedings in a court or tribunal.

Sitting with my client discussing business structures alternatives, tax strategies, GST compliance issues, and the like does not, in my opinion, come anywhere near the coverage of Act. When we decide a course of direction, a registered legal practitioner is then engaged to draw up the necessary instruments.

The discussion where other states are concerned may be more ambiguous as the term is legal practice which is not defined but interpreted (widely) in common law and administrative tribunals. This still supports my assertion at the beginning of my post that the information you have provided above is incorrect and may be misleading to the ordinary general public members who come to this forum for information