Home – New › Forums › Tech talk › Big shuffle of Google search results..?
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 26, 2012 at 8:05 am #1102277Up::0
Well the ironic part of the whole story is how 1st position in Google for SEO … Australia TOP SEO god… has over 700 domain names registered in different companies, ABNs and hosting.
All of the flowing links to their customers.
A very advanced blog farm system.
Curious?
Do a link building analysis of the top position for SEO… of if you have toys look at the links they have for their customers
they (the SEO company) owns 90% of the sites that link to their customers.So, yep… all about QUALITY in results :rolleyes:
April 26, 2012 at 8:20 am #1102231Up::0seocourse, post: 114259 wrote:Well the ironic part of the whole story is how 1st position in Google for SEO … Australia TOP SEO god… has over 700 domain names registered in different companies, ABNs and hosting.All of the flowing links to their customers.
A very advanced blog farm system.
Curious?
Do a link building analysis of the top position for SEO… of if you have toys look at the links they have for their customers
they (the SEO company) owns 90% of the sites that link to their customers.So, yep… all about QUALITY in results :rolleyes:
The number 1 ranking for me is a Brisbane SEO comapany – dejanseo.com.au
I can’t tell where you are located from your blog but I am guessing it is not the same for you..??
Is one of the ‘quality’ algorithms influencing what you are seeing, your Geolocation?April 26, 2012 at 8:20 am #1102279Up::0seocourse, post: 114259 wrote:Well the ironic part of the whole story is how 1st position in Google for SEO … Australia TOP SEO god… has over 700 domain names registered in different companies, ABNs and hosting.All of the flowing links to their customers.
A very advanced blog farm system.
Curious?
Do a link building analysis of the top position for SEO… of if you have toys look at the links they have for their customers
they (the SEO company) owns 90% of the sites that link to their customers.So, yep… all about QUALITY in results :rolleyes:
The number 1 ranking for me is a Brisbane SEO comapany – dejanseo.com.au
I can’t tell where you are located from your blog but I am guessing it is not the same for you..??
Is one of the ‘quality’ algorithms influencing what you are seeing, your Geolocation?April 26, 2012 at 8:32 am #1102232Up::0T J Madigan, post: 114262 wrote:The number 1 ranking for me is a Brisbane SEO comapany – dejanseo.com.au
I can’t tell where you are located from your blog but I am guessing it is not the same for you..??
Is one of the ‘quality’ algorithms influencing what you are seeing, your Geolocation?The same my boy, the same…
April 26, 2012 at 8:32 am #1102281Up::0T J Madigan, post: 114262 wrote:The number 1 ranking for me is a Brisbane SEO comapany – dejanseo.com.au
I can’t tell where you are located from your blog but I am guessing it is not the same for you..??
Is one of the ‘quality’ algorithms influencing what you are seeing, your Geolocation?The same my boy, the same…
April 26, 2012 at 8:33 am #1102233Up::0I will love to tell more, but I’m sure if you have the tools you can realize how they are “ranking their customers”
Just look at the domain names that link
do a whois
look at the other sites they link 2
you will find the trail pretty quicklyApril 26, 2012 at 8:33 am #1102282Up::0I will love to tell more, but I’m sure if you have the tools you can realize how they are “ranking their customers”
Just look at the domain names that link
do a whois
look at the other sites they link 2
you will find the trail pretty quicklyApril 26, 2012 at 9:03 am #1102234Up::0seocourse, post: 114266 wrote:I will love to tell more, but I’m sure if you have the tools you can realize how they are “ranking their customers”
Just look at the domain names that link
do a whois
look at the other sites they link 2
you will find the trail pretty quicklyFairfax did the same thing 15 years ago.
He set up a domain link network and leveraged its power to build a huge online empire. At the moment, it seems be quite an effective way of getting clients sites to rank. I don’t do it, but that doesn’t take away from the fact that he is making money from it, and so are his clients (presumably). Maybe one day Google will penalize such strategies and if he has all of his eggs in one basket, that may very well be be his downfall. But until then… it seems that Google is rewarding him for his efforts. His Clients have relevant sites ranking at the top of Google. They are happy, the browsers are happy, he is happy, Google is happy. I don’t really see the problem.Maybe you see some underhanded and evil deed being committed that I can’t see??
April 26, 2012 at 9:03 am #1102284Up::0seocourse, post: 114266 wrote:I will love to tell more, but I’m sure if you have the tools you can realize how they are “ranking their customers”
Just look at the domain names that link
do a whois
look at the other sites they link 2
you will find the trail pretty quicklyFairfax did the same thing 15 years ago.
He set up a domain link network and leveraged its power to build a huge online empire. At the moment, it seems be quite an effective way of getting clients sites to rank. I don’t do it, but that doesn’t take away from the fact that he is making money from it, and so are his clients (presumably). Maybe one day Google will penalize such strategies and if he has all of his eggs in one basket, that may very well be be his downfall. But until then… it seems that Google is rewarding him for his efforts. His Clients have relevant sites ranking at the top of Google. They are happy, the browsers are happy, he is happy, Google is happy. I don’t really see the problem.Maybe you see some underhanded and evil deed being committed that I can’t see??
April 26, 2012 at 9:08 am #1102235Up::0T J Madigan, post: 114269 wrote:Fairfax did the same thing 15 years ago.
He set up a domain link network and leveraged its power to build a huge online empire. At the moment, it seems be quite an effective way of getting clients sites to rank. I don’t do it, but that doesn’t take away from the fact that he is making money from it, and so are his clients (presumably). Maybe one day Google will penalize such strategies and if he has all of his eggs in one basket, that may very well be be his downfall. But until then… it seems that Google is rewarding him for his efforts. His Clients have relevant sites ranking at the top of Google. They are happy, the browsers are happy, he is happy, Google is happy. I don’t really see the problem.Maybe you see some underhanded and evil deed being committed that I can’t see??
Evil?
Nah.
Just smart.
What do you think happens when the customer stops paying?Google is not rewarding him for the efforts, Google algorithm can’t do an ABN research to realize all the companies registering domains are owned by the same people.
So they know they are playing with the algorithm…. but they spend the whole day talking about “white hat”
Based on pure theory if you are using link schemes to increase ranking that is not white hat. Don’t ask me, ask he ugly guy with glasses at Google, mr Cutts
April 26, 2012 at 9:08 am #1102286Up::0T J Madigan, post: 114269 wrote:Fairfax did the same thing 15 years ago.
He set up a domain link network and leveraged its power to build a huge online empire. At the moment, it seems be quite an effective way of getting clients sites to rank. I don’t do it, but that doesn’t take away from the fact that he is making money from it, and so are his clients (presumably). Maybe one day Google will penalize such strategies and if he has all of his eggs in one basket, that may very well be be his downfall. But until then… it seems that Google is rewarding him for his efforts. His Clients have relevant sites ranking at the top of Google. They are happy, the browsers are happy, he is happy, Google is happy. I don’t really see the problem.Maybe you see some underhanded and evil deed being committed that I can’t see??
Evil?
Nah.
Just smart.
What do you think happens when the customer stops paying?Google is not rewarding him for the efforts, Google algorithm can’t do an ABN research to realize all the companies registering domains are owned by the same people.
So they know they are playing with the algorithm…. but they spend the whole day talking about “white hat”
Based on pure theory if you are using link schemes to increase ranking that is not white hat. Don’t ask me, ask he ugly guy with glasses at Google, mr Cutts
April 26, 2012 at 9:14 am #1102236Up::0Also, if my company owns all the links that give you ranking …. what’s the difference with this:
From Google guideline
However, some webmasters engage in link exchange schemes and build partner pages exclusively for the sake of cross-linking, disregarding the quality of the links, the sources, and the long-term impact it will have on their sites. This is in violation of Google’s Webmaster Guidelines and can negatively impact your site’s ranking in search results. Examples of link schemes can include:
- Links intended to manipulate PageRank
All the domain names purchased are
a) dropped
b) with page rank
c) created JUST to send backlinksIsn’t that a link scheme?
Hey, no idea, may be is time for me to stop thinking about SEO for one day
nite all
Aidan… you know what I mean, don’t you?
April 26, 2012 at 9:14 am #1102288Up::0Also, if my company owns all the links that give you ranking …. what’s the difference with this:
From Google guideline
However, some webmasters engage in link exchange schemes and build partner pages exclusively for the sake of cross-linking, disregarding the quality of the links, the sources, and the long-term impact it will have on their sites. This is in violation of Google’s Webmaster Guidelines and can negatively impact your site’s ranking in search results. Examples of link schemes can include:
- Links intended to manipulate PageRank
All the domain names purchased are
a) dropped
b) with page rank
c) created JUST to send backlinksIsn’t that a link scheme?
Hey, no idea, may be is time for me to stop thinking about SEO for one day
nite all
Aidan… you know what I mean, don’t you?
April 26, 2012 at 9:46 am #1102237Up::0syeds, post: 0 wrote:Wait for a day and it might be google dance.He’s been ranking there a long time, not just today.
April 26, 2012 at 9:46 am #1102290Up::0syeds, post: 0 wrote:Wait for a day and it might be google dance.He’s been ranking there a long time, not just today.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.